首页> 外文OA文献 >Effects of ecological compensation meadows on arthropod diversity in adjacent intensively managed grassland
【2h】

Effects of ecological compensation meadows on arthropod diversity in adjacent intensively managed grassland

机译:生态补偿草地对邻近集约化草地节肢动物多样性的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An important goal of ecological compensation areas (ECAs) is to increase biodiversity in adjacent intensively\udmanaged farmland and the agricultural landscape at large. We tested whether this goal can be achieved in the case of the agri-environmental restoration scheme implemented for Swiss grassland using five large arthropod taxa (bees, true bugs, orthopterans, ground beetles and spiders) representing\uddifferent ecological and functional groups. The species richness and abundance of all groups and species, respectively, was measured along 100 m transects from ECA-meadows into the adjacent intensively managed grassland at 24 sites. Species richness of all arthropod taxa except ground beetles, and the abundance of 63% of the 234 arthropod species sampled with at least five individuals were higher in ECAmeadows than in their surroundings, while the total abundance of spiders and ground beetles was higher\udin intensively managed meadows. The abundance of 8% of these species were only increased in the ECAmeadows\udthemselves ("stenotopic" species) but 40% had increased abundance both in the ECA-meadows and the adjacent grassland, declining exponentially with increasing distance from ECA-meadows ("edge species"). The 90%-decay distances for these edge species differed among taxonomic groups (117 ± 18 m for true bugs, 137 ± 24 m for spiders, 152 ± 34 m for bees, 167 ± 5.7 m for orthopterans, 185 ± 34 m for\udground beetles; mean ±1 standard error) and independent of taxonomic group were larger for large-sized or predacious species than for small-sized or phytophagous species. Because the average distance between neighbouring ECA-meadows in Swiss grassland is only 73 ± 4 m, the current agri-environment scheme very likely enhances arthropod diversity and possibly associated ecosystem services in the Swiss agricultural landscape at large.
机译:生态补偿区(ECA)的一个重要目标是增加邻近的集约化/未管理耕地以及整个农业景观的生物多样性。我们测试了在瑞士草原上实施的农业环境恢复计划是否可以实现这一目标,该计划使用了代表不同生态和功能群体的五个大型节肢动物类群(蜜蜂,真虫,直翅类动物,地面甲虫和蜘蛛)。在从ECA草甸进入24个站点的相邻集约化草地的100 m样带上,分别测量了所有组和物种的物种丰富度和丰度。除地甲虫外,所有节肢动物类群的物种丰富度,在至少5个个体中采样的234种节肢动物物种中,有63%的丰度高于其周围环境,而蜘蛛和地面甲虫的总丰度则较高\ udin管理的草地。这些物种的8%的丰度仅在ECAmeadows \ udthemselves(“异位”物种)中增加,而40%的ECA草甸和邻近草地中的丰度都增加了,与ECA-草甸的距离呈指数下降(“边缘物种”)。这些边缘物种的90%衰减距离在分类学组中有所不同(真虫为117±18 m,蜘蛛为137±24 m,蜜蜂为152±34 m,直翅目为167±5.7 m,昆虫为185±34 m)\大型或珍贵物种的皮毛甲虫(均数±1标准误)和独立于分类组的比例大于小型或植物吞噬性物种。由于瑞士草原上相邻ECA草甸之间的平均距离仅为73±4 m,因此当前的农业环境计划很可能会增强整个瑞士农业景观中的节肢动物多样性以及相关的生态系统服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号